Originally Posted by Kingdom_of_Zito
Nash deserved them. The suns don't matter if they stuck with Stephon Marbury. And if you argue Barbosa could run them, you must watch some other NBA league.
|
Then tell me why Stockton didn't get any MVPs in his great career? Both are similar players, 20 ppg, 10 apg, except Stockton played defense, NBA's alltime steals and assist leader.
Originally Posted by giantsfan5689
Yes there is, it's the concept of THE MOST VALUABLE PLAYER. That's all you need to know. You pick the player most valuable to their team. You don't have to have any set minimums or anything. It's simply the most valuable player
|
No there isn't you got players winning MVP award based on the best record, not based on numbers, if that logic is true, Arod and Jimmy Rollins dont deserve to win the MVP awards because there teams didn't have the best record in there leagues.
Micheal Jordan and Allen Iverson lead the league in scoring while winning the MVP award.
Kobe should have won it in 05-06 but he didn't because allot of voters hold his Colorado incident against him.
Originally Posted by ljshorty89
I will succumb to the idea that it is arguable whether or not Nash deserved his first. But in 05-06, Nash did not have Stoudamire. He was the leader of a team that was only him and Marion. What you have to realize is that the MVP is not about scoring. The ball has to get to Marion and Stoudamire, and Barbosa or Marbury would not do that as consistently.
|
And Stockton only had one superstar in Malone his whole career, and yet he never even got consideration for one.