This is a discussion on NL Cy Young: Is it really even a question who is the leading candidate? within the S3F Original Articles and Podcasts forum at Strike 3 Forums; OMG one night means EVERYTHING! Let's pick a moment in time to prove our ...
NL Cy Young: Is it really even a question who is the leading candidate?
missionhockey21
08-20-2005
NL Cy Young: Is it really even a question who is the leading candidate?
by missionhockey21
As we move closer to the end of the season, the talk and the hype for player awards begins to build. And the discussion by the national media for one award, the National League Cy Young, is really frustrating me. Most so called “experts” seem to feel that at this point there are three...
OMG one night means EVERYTHING! Let's pick a moment in time to prove our point:
On September 9th Clemens lost, pitched 3 innings, giving up 5 walks, 5 hits, 5 earned runs, and 2 homers. His ERA was 15.00 and his WHIP was 3.33. Surely, he is a horrible pitcher and shouldn't even be in the pros
I never said that. You're not getting it...again. You were laughing because I mentioned his seasonal ERA as 2.59 now, acting as though the ERA doesn't matter much. Tonight was another example of his WHIP not being as good either. He gave up a ton of baserunners and paid for it. His ERA is not as good as Clemens' ERA for a reason.
Clemens hasn't pitched a game in 10 days. So we should assume that he would've put up numbers like his last outing: 5.2 IP, 4 ER. Shame on Carpenter and Willis for giving up runs in their last start instead of getting hurt like Clemens.
Clemens hasn't pitched a game in 10 days. So we should assume that he would've put up numbers like his last outing: 5.2 IP, 4 ER. Shame on Carpenter and Willis for giving up runs in their last start instead of getting hurt like Clemens.
You should assume that based on the fact that Clemens' ERA/WHIP were lower to begin with than both of them. The chances of them giving up a bunch of Runs was much more likely than him.
Clemens' numbers covering the whole season have been better and they are even better now than before.
I offer this challenge to CincyRedsFan30 and all othrs who die by stats. (Stats kill, winning lives). I will play you a best of seven series. My pitchers win four games, your guys can win 0, 1, 2, or 3 games. You can have, use and have an edge in any stat you desire and in any combination. Your guys can have the edge in hitting, fielding, all the pitching stats but wins. And in the final result my guys win, and are the best. With the desired result of the team winning, a pitcher can do no more for his team than to win. Any other stat is meaningless compared to winning. Stats compared to winning, particularly ERA vs.wins is like comparing a wooden nickel to a hundred dollar bill. Clemens is not even the best pitcher on his team, much less deserving a Cy Young this year. My vote is Carpenter, with Willis a good second. Statisticians out there, keep your head buried in your stats, and the world will pass you by.
Despite Carpenter's numbers last night, the more important thing is that he kept his team in the game. Clemens has pitched almost four game less than Carp and Willis so he is more likely to have fewer numbers. Its between Willis and Carp.