Originally Posted by love_that_reefer
If Cain was on the Yankees, he could have 19 wins too. Plus Cain and Lincecum DO play in a tougher division than the Yankees. You can go by wins, I'll go by stuff. Lincecum and Cain have better stuff than Wang. Hell, all the pitchers I named have better stuff.
|
Right. How many World Series Champions have you produced in the past 12 years?
We have what? '96, '98, '99, '00, '04, '07.
You have '01.
We have how many Championship Series Teams? '96 (2), '97, '98, '99 (2), '00, '01, '03 (2), '04 (2), '07.
You have: '98, '01, '02, '07 (2)
Let's strictly look at last year you say? We had 2 playoff teams, so did you. Let's take a wash, because we Won the WS, even though you had two LCS teams.
Still not happy? I mean, I don't know what to say...how about it's harder for an AL pitcher to throw a perfect game because of the DH? How about Wang is closer than everyone on the list except Verlander, and way closer than Cain or Lincecum?
Drop the homerism.
Originally Posted by Dry1313
With Joba and Mo, I'm not saying he is the king of complete games...I'm saying there's only one other pitcher I can think of who's effective that late into the game, and he's really the guy I think should be #1 on this list:
Roy Halladay
|
No love?
Originally Posted by love_that_reefer
Wang is no ace so I didn't put him up there. Plus like KOZ said, he doesn't go deep into games like every Yankees starter. I don't see how he has a better shot than most of those ****ers. I wouldn't even put Wang in the class of Johnson, Cone, Wells or Rogers. Wang's good but not that good. He would be the number three pitcher for the Giants behind Cain and Lincecum. You are right about Halladay though.
|
No ace? Let's check that: 2nd in CY voting, didn't make the voting last year, but a nearly identical pitcher (barring a 100 discrepancy in K numbers won it.)
Wang's 162 game AVG is: 19-7, 3.73 ERA, 224 IP...an ERA 70 points below the average...right, he's no ace...

Originally Posted by browntown653
Wait, the guy who's won more games than anyone over the last 2 seasons would be the Giants #3, with practically the same ERA as Cain in a much tougher league, and a better ERA than Lincecum who hasn't even pitched one full season?...wow, I would love to have somebody explain this logic to me. And why can't Wang get up there when he's come closer than probably anybody on that list to throwing a perfect game??
|
Thank you.
Sucks your a Yankee fan...guess we're homers.
Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo
Wang's won more games for the Yankees than anyone over the last 2 seasons?
Did he score the runs for them in those games?
|
Valid point.
Originally Posted by browntown653
I'm not going to debate that, but stuff does not translate into success...Kyle Farnsworth clearly has better stuff than Hideki Okajima, for example.
|
Or let's say, Jeff Weaver versus Gil Meche.
Originally Posted by love_that_reefer
Yankees actually have an offense to supply runs.
|
Cain had 3.09375 runs scored per game he pitched.
Wang had 6.43 runs scored per game he pitched.
Truth on the run support.
Cain's team also gave up 4 or more runs in 20/32 starts.
Wang's team gave up 4 or more in 14/30...I mean, I think that speaks to bullpen and defense more than run support...
Half the time Wang would pitch and the opposing team would score less than 4...
2/3 of the time Cain pitched, they would give up more than 4.
I think that's a better sign than run support. So Wang won a few games he shouldn't have...Cain lost a few. Wang also pitched better. In a harder league. Against better hitters.
Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo

|
Originally Posted by love_that_reefer
Farnsworth has better stuff? When did this shit happen? Just because he throws hard doesn't mean he has good stuff. Kyle has always been a thrower and never a pitcher.
|
Bullshit. Farnsworth has sick movement...he likes to throw ****ing sliders though...I hate when people talk about things they don't know like they're in the know.
Originally Posted by browntown653
He does have great stuff, he just locates it poorly.
|
And throws too many sliders, a la Jeff Nelson.
Originally Posted by rockin500
eh, a 100 mph fastball isnt stuff. thats just heat. his fastball doesnt move much.
|
Watch games man...he has nasty movement...he just loves his crappy slider.
Originally Posted by browntown653
Which is movement.
|
Originally Posted by love_that_reefer
No Maddux's fastball=movement. 98 mph with no movement=moon shots. You will hard pressed to find anyone who thinks Farnsworth has ever had good stuff.
|
WOW
Read scouting reports.
"Kyle Farnsworth has dominant stuff but has trouble locating his slider at times, as well as serving up the occasional arrow-straight fastball that catches a little too much of the plate. Nonetheless, Farnsworth was reasonably effective in both middle relief and as a setup man, but he always seems to fall a little short of meeting expectations based purely on his stuff."
Chicago Cubs - 2004
Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo
"movement" doesn't mean from the pitcher's hand to the catcher's glove.
"movement" means the ball not traveling a straight line in that path.
As LTR pointed out, Greg Maddux has movement in his fastball. Jake Peavy does as well.
When they throw a fastball it doesn't just go straight to the catcher's glove. It dances around a bit. (Jake's is kinda freaky sometimes.)
I don't really know about Farnsworth, cuz I've never really seen him pitch, but if he has a straight 100 mph fastball as stated in this thread that's not movement. That's just heat.
Judging by his success in the major league level, however, I'd guess the assessment that he had none is correct.
|
Wrong. It's his slider. Glad you admit that you don't really know, unlike reefer
Originally Posted by love_that_reefer
Listen, I'm not saying Wang is horrible. I just don't think think he is in the top tier of starting pitching. He's solid #2 guy like a Chris Young to a Jake Peavy or a Dan Haren to Brandon Webb.
|
Wow, dig yourself a bigger hole.
You want to talk about movement, watch a Wang sinker. Seriously, just because he doesn't throw 95 and look like an ace doesn't mean he isn't one. Did Orel Hershiser knock down doors? No. Was he an ace? Yes.
Seriously, stop dealing with classical terms of "ace" and look where it matters...QS, ERA, and W.
Wang is one of the majors' top aces...
Did you ever think that maybe it's not "he's good because the team is so good" but "the team is good because he's so good"
Most underrated pitcher in baseball.