 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
my analyst says...
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 3.30
|
Which team will win the NL West in 2006? -
04-30-2006, 08:16 PM
last of 'em...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my analyst says...
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 3.30
|
04-30-2006, 08:20 PM
I dunno...I think of all the divisions, this is the most wide open...I voted for the Dodgers because...well, I don't know...I just did.
Either way I don't think it will matter as I doubt the team from the NL West will be win the NL anyway...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Freak
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 4.84
|
04-30-2006, 08:22 PM
I say SF because they are a much better team this year and they have a deep bench. Bullpen is the only thing that scares me as they are last in the NL in ERA.
Giants > Padres
Pathetic Stat of the Year- Matt Cain has a 3.70 career ERA, but has won just 29 of his 95 starts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
my analyst says...
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 3.30
|
04-30-2006, 08:24 PM
I really think any of the teams could come away with the division crown...I can't really see anyone pulling away
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whatd'ya askin me for?
Status:
Online
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hot Springs, Arkansas
Major League ERA: 2.28
|
05-02-2006, 10:39 PM
I say the Padres because the division is wide open enough for me to homer out for them.
http://www.rachelscott.com

| League | Team | GM Record | current season | division | WC | LDS | LCS | WS | Years active |
|---|
| SBSL | Vice City Hitmen | 204-172 | 28-24, 3rdt | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2007-Present | | TSSL | San Diego Padres | 347-421 | 67-53, 1st | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2014-Present | | TPSL | Chicago White Sox | 181-189 | 19-27, 4th | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2010-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bronson Arroyo Sucks!
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Florence, Kentucky
Major League ERA: 1.44
|
05-04-2006, 07:15 PM
I voted for San Diego because if Bonds gets back to the postseason, I'll puke.
rf28
Jay Bruce Watch: 3 games, 3 starts, 4-9, 2 1B, 2 2B, 4 BB, 1 HBP, 2 SB, 2 RBI
It IS about whether you win or lose!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arggh, matey.
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fairmont, W.V.
Major League ERA: 4.33
|
05-04-2006, 07:29 PM
Another 82-80 division winner perhaps? Or worse?
resistriseabove (12:35:43 AM): ARABIC MUFFDIVERS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whatd'ya askin me for?
Status:
Online
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hot Springs, Arkansas
Major League ERA: 2.28
|
05-04-2006, 07:34 PM
as long as San Diego's offense doesn't die and go back to the way they were in April they should win this division.
The pitching has been much better than expected
The bullpen is great, as always
It's only the anemic offense that's been losing games for them in April. Now that the offense has woken up...we're seeing the results. (granted, it's a small sample size, we have yet to see if it's "getting back to form" or just a simple hot streak.)
http://www.rachelscott.com

| League | Team | GM Record | current season | division | WC | LDS | LCS | WS | Years active |
|---|
| SBSL | Vice City Hitmen | 204-172 | 28-24, 3rdt | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2007-Present | | TSSL | San Diego Padres | 347-421 | 67-53, 1st | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2014-Present | | TPSL | Chicago White Sox | 181-189 | 19-27, 4th | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2010-Present |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thread Killah/Angels Mod
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: In a van down by the river
Triple-A ERA: 3.22
|

05-05-2006, 01:00 PM
Originally Posted by redsfan28
I voted for San Diego because if Bonds gets back to the postseason, I'll puke.
|
LOLOLOL 
GO PADRES AND ANGELS ALL THE WAY IN 2008
 ................  ..................
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Computer
Triple-A ERA: 2.89
|
05-06-2006, 02:05 AM
Yes I had to be biased, though my 2nd vote would have gone to Padres, though now I am pulling for the Rockies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Computer
Triple-A ERA: 2.89
|
05-06-2006, 02:07 AM
Originally Posted by Kingdom_of_Zito
Another 82-80 division winner perhaps? Or worse?
|
Gosh I hope that does not happen again. Maybe we (NL West teams) can go very close, and have a very record/
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OC Padre Fan
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Irvine, CA
Single-A ERA: 7.46
|

05-14-2006, 04:41 PM
Originally Posted by Kingdom_of_Zito
Another 82-80 division winner perhaps? Or worse?
|
Contrary to ESPN's opinions the NL West is NOT the worst division in baseball, unless they've forgotten to look at the AL West and the NL Central.
FRESNO STATE SCHEDULE
v. Sacramento State W 24-3 (1-0)
@ (25) Texas A&M L 47-45 3 OT's (1-1)
@ Oregon L 54-21 (1-2)
v. Louisiana Tech W 17-6 (2-2, 1-0)
@ Nevada W 49-41 (3-2, 2-0)
@ Idaho W 37-24 (4-2, 3-0)
v. San Jose State W 30-0 (5-2, 4-0)
v. Boise State L 34-21 (5-3, 4-1)
v. Utah State W 38-27 (6-3, 5-1)
@ Hawaii L 37-30 (6-4, 5-2)
v. Kansas State W 45-29 (7-4, 5-2)
@ New Mexico State
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whatd'ya askin me for?
Status:
Online
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Hot Springs, Arkansas
Major League ERA: 2.28
|
05-14-2006, 07:22 PM
through the first quarter of the 2006 season
1. NL West: 97-86 .530%
2. AL East: 94-85 .525%
3. NL Central: 111-107 .509%
4. AL Central: 89-87 .506%
5. AL West: 67-78 .462%
6. NL East: 80-95 .457%
For the sake of comparing divisons' records against the others (i.e., excluding all intra-division records):
1. NL West: 53-42, 568%
2. AL East: 40-31 563%
3. NL Central: 54-50 519%
4. AL Central: 37-35 514%
5. AL West: 41-52 441%
6. NL East: 34-49 410%
**** you ESPN
http://www.rachelscott.com

| League | Team | GM Record | current season | division | WC | LDS | LCS | WS | Years active |
|---|
| SBSL | Vice City Hitmen | 204-172 | 28-24, 3rdt | 0 | 1 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2007-Present | | TSSL | San Diego Padres | 347-421 | 67-53, 1st | 1 | 0 | 0-1 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2014-Present | | TPSL | Chicago White Sox | 181-189 | 19-27, 4th | 0 | 0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 0-0 | 2010-Present |
|
|
|
|
|