 |
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|||||||
|
 |
 |
 |
This is a discussion on Which 2005 last place team won't finish last in 2006? within the Polls forum at Strike 3 Forums; Which team that finished in last place in their division in 2005 is least likely ...
| View Poll Results: Which 2005 last place team won't finish last in 2006? | |||
| Colorado |
  
|
9 | 32.14% |
| Washington |
  
|
5 | 17.86% |
| Pittsburgh |
  
|
4 | 14.29% |
| Tampa Bay |
  
|
1 | 3.57% |
| Kansas City |
  
|
0 | 0% |
| Seattle |
  
|
9 | 32.14% |
| Voters: 28. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
 |
Which 2005 last place team won't finish last in 2006? |
 |
|
|
|
(#1)
|
  Oooh, yeah!
  
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 3.41
|
Which 2005 last place team won't finish last in 2006? -
04-14-2006, 07:26 PM
    Which team that finished in last place in their division in 2005 is least likely to finish there in 2006?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#2)
|
 Turd Ferguson
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 1.35
|
04-14-2006, 07:30 PM
I chose Washington, only because Florida has so little outside of their two big stars. I think Hanley will cool off, and they will settle into a level of suck. Colorado's a good choice, as is Pittsburgh considering there are 5 other teams in the division
 Then out of fairness to the others you will be Slagathor. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#3)
|
 Administrator
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cheyenne, WY
Major League ERA: 3.81
|
04-14-2006, 07:32 PM
I have to say the Rockies. They are doing a heck of a lot better on the road this year and they have a very young solid team. I think they could even contend for the pennant if they can get some of the younger guys to meet their talent.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#4)
|
|
Oooh, yeah!
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 3.41
|
04-14-2006, 07:34 PM
I was torn between Washington and Seattle...I ended up voting for Seattle because I think Texas will finish last due to their pitching...but I think both will get out of the basement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#5)
|
 Dazed and Confused
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: New York City
Major League ERA: 2.97
|
04-14-2006, 07:40 PM
I'm giving it to Washington, but my dumbass voted for Pittsburgh by accident.
 -General George S. Patton, Jr., US Army |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#6)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando
Major League ERA: 3.36
|
04-14-2006, 07:41 PM
Washington is the safest bet. But I think we'll finish above Texas too, I also don't think that Pittsburgh finishes last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#7)
|
|
59 W, 678 2/3 IP, GOAT
Status: Offline
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NY
Major League ERA: 2.16
|
04-14-2006, 07:48 PM
Pittsburgh has great young talent and Cincy has bumbling management so I don't see them in last. Also, I like Tampa's youth so I don't see them in last either. Obviously Washington won't be in last, and I don't know if Seattle will be. But I think it's a safe bet to see Colorado and KC in the cellar once again.
 The Greatest Day in Yankee History. The day the two greatest were born. S3SL Atlanta Braves GM 2016-Current 761-967 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#8)
|
|
Blow My Fuse
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Alameda CA
Major League ERA: 1.65
|
04-14-2006, 07:49 PM
I'm going with the Rockies; hell, they hit something like six doubles in one game on the road recently. That said I remember them starting out hot last year and their announcers being all excited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#9)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 1.28
|
04-14-2006, 08:11 PM
Washington, because Dan Uggla is Florida's second baseman.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#10)
|
|
GFX guru is back.
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Redmond, WA
Major League ERA: 0.66
|
04-14-2006, 08:18 PM
I think Washington and Seattle.
http://img176.imageshack.us/img176/3...irosig6vx8.jpg
http://strike3forums.com/images/Mari...riners-sig.jpg Mariners Artwork | Request a Sig Circular logic aside, Mr Mims, you have yet to provide a single credible reason why you are, in fact, hot. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#11)
|
||
|
Where amazing happens
Status: Offline
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Fairmont, W.V.
Major League ERA: 4.47
|
04-14-2006, 10:02 PM
Pittsburgh
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#12)
|
|
Hall of Famer
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Computer
Triple-A ERA: 2.89
|
04-14-2006, 10:06 PM
Colorado 2nd choice would be Seatle
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#13)
|
|
Oooh, yeah!
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Major League ERA: 3.41
|
04-14-2006, 10:27 PM
2 out of 3 M's fans agree...no last place in 2006!
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(#14)
|
|
|
Hall of Famer
Status: Offline
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Orlando
Major League ERA: 3.36
|
04-14-2006, 10:28 PM
|