Originally Posted by Bear
Providence A's... No, what my thought was if they traded another player (say an outfielder) for a quality pitcher, than would it not make sense to trade Zito for what ever the market bears so you will not end up with nothing? Just a thought.
|
I don't think they'd be able to get another quality (already proven or ready to play in the majors type) pitcher whether they dealt Zito for one or dealt someone else for one and then Zito afterwards.
I know I've said this a million times (at least it feels like I have), but Zito won't go anywhere as far as a trade is concerned unless the A's play their way out of making the playoffs or the injuries continue and then they fall apart. Zito is pitching well, so we're not going be able to get someone better right now to offset trading him. We get 2 draft picks if he walks (1st rounder and a compensation pick after the 1st and before the 2nd round).
The A's have more of a history of letting players walk (Giambi, Tejada, Damon, Foulke, Isringhausen, etc) and getting draft picks than trading them (Mulder and Hudson) and getting specs and MLB ready players. That is what I think will happen...after the season (preferably after winning the World Series), Zito walks and the A's take 2 picks in the 2007 draft...especially since we don't have a 1st round pick this season.
If the A's were out of it for whatever reason, then Beane would trade him and I know the Mets and Dodgers have specs and MLB ready players he wants or would want, but the Mets won't trade those players and I'm sure the Dodgers won't either if they think they can sign Zito in the off-season.
Due to the fact that there are over 2 months left at the trade deadline teams are going to be reluctant to give up 3 specs / MLB ready players unless they know Zito will help them win the World Series (this would be under the scenario that the A's are completely out of it and want to rape a team's farm system). I just don't see that happening either.