Originally Posted by HollywoodLeo
Ugh.
Crawford just cost them the game.
Not that he's a goat for making a horrible play, as it would have been a great catch, but still.
|
I totally disagree. He should have made that catch, it went off his glove. It's like the rule in football where if it touches your hands, you have to make the catch no matter what the rest of your body is doing. You could jump 10 feet in the air and drop the pass, and you should have made the catch. Same here. Crawford should totally have made that catch. He cost them game 1. Well........at least defensively. Then there's all the bats too